Last updated October 2, 2023
6 minute read |
Rule 10b‑5 under the Exchange Act in effect provides that anyone who possesses “material nonpublic information” regarding the company abstain from trading in company securities, for as long as such material nonpublic information remains undisclosed. Determining what information is “material” is often difficult, but the basic test is whether it is information a reasonable investor would consider important in determining whether to purchase or sell securities.
Government and private actions alleging insider trading have targeted not only individual violators, but companies as well for trading by their directors, executive officers and employees. Companies may be the target of insider trading charges if, among other reasons, a person “controlled” by the company engages in unlawful insider trading or the company “aids and abets” insider trading.
The scope and content of a company’s insider trading policy will vary depending on a number of factors, including size, maturity, number of employees and the trading market for the company’s securities, and should be adapted to fit a company’s particular facts and circumstances. A brief policy highlighting key principles may be enough for some companies, while a more robust policy with detailed procedures may be more suitable for others. Some companies may embed their insider trading policy within their code of conduct rather than adopt a stand-alone insider trading policy.
The policy should include an overview or statement of purpose that contains a “plain English” definition or explanation of what constitutes insider trading. This section should also provide guidance on what “materiality” and “non-public” mean, concepts that are fundamental to an understanding of insider trading. Consider using examples to aid in setting forth these definitions.
Once an insider trading policy is in place, it is recommended that companies develop onboarding and ongoing training programs to provide education regarding insider training and the company’s policy. The company should also task someone, likely someone in the legal department or a compliance officer, with administering the policy and should also identify a back-up contact in case the primary contact is unavailable. These final steps are integral to enforcement of a company’s insider trading policy.
Orrick is passionate about entrepreneurship and shaping the long-term success of our clients. We advise public and private companies throughout the world on all aspects of their business and at every stage of their development and growth. Leading companies and investment banks turn to us for guidance and support in meeting their strategic objectives and navigating the capital raising environment—from the standard to the most innovative and complex—including initial public offerings and other public equity and debt transactions. With 1,100 lawyers based in key markets worldwide, our global platform allows us to meet the needs of our clients wherever they do business.
To join our mailing list, visit orrick.com.
This publication is designed to provide Orrick clients and contacts with information they can use to more effectively manage their businesses and access Orrick’s resources. The contents of this publication are for informational purposes only. Neither this publication nor the lawyers who authored it are rendering legal or other professional advice or opinions on specific facts or matters. Orrick assumes no liability in connection with the use of this publication.