Last updated October 2, 2023
5 minute read |
Conducting an initial public offering is a transformative event in a company’s lifecycle. Becoming a public company requires numerous significant changes that are necessary to comply with SEC regulations and an accelerated and heightened financial reporting process, as well as handle constant market and investor scrutiny, while maintaining positive investor relations. Companies often hire a general counsel, a CFO and additional finance personnel, and additional IR/marketing support in anticipation of an IPO. In addition, due to the corporate governance listing standards of the Nasdaq and NYSE, most companies are required to implement significant corporate governance changes at the time of an IPO. These changes include recruiting additional board members, creating independent board committees, and holding executive sessions with independent board members, which are detailed in “IPO Insights. Assembling your Public Company Board of Directors.”
Public company boards are also subjected to more scrutiny from shareholders than prior to the IPO. The investment bankers taking a company public and the investors that invest in an IPO will expect a company to comply with the corporate governance requirements of the national securities exchange on which the company’s shares are being listed at the time of the IPO. Certain investors, including institutional investors, may have corporate governance practices that they expect to be reflected in the governance documents and practices of the companies in which they invest.
Immediately prior to or substantially concurrently with the closing of an IPO, companies typically amend and restate their charter and bylaws to reflect governance standards that comply with Nasdaq or NYSE listing standards and are more closely aligned with public company practice. Anti-takeover measures in public company charters and bylaws, which are adopted to protect against the threat of shareholder activism, may vary based on whether a company is a “controlled company” (with more than 50% of the voting power for the election of its directors being held by a single person, entity or group) and its shares are predominantly held by large institutional investors or a founder or if its shareholder base is widely distributed. They may also be impacted by whether the company is a smaller, newly public company or a larger, more established public company. Companies should also consider the governance guidelines of institutional investors and proxy advisory firms, such as Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. (ISS) and Glass Lewis & Co. (Glass Lewis), which make shareholder voting recommendations in accordance with their governance guidelines and may influence the votes at a company's shareholder meeting.
Anti-takeover protections to consider include:
Smaller, newly public companies are at times able to include a greater number of anti-takeover provisions in their charter and bylaws as a result of facing less scrutiny from the public, proxy advisory firms and shareholder activists at the outset. Sponsors are also often able to negotiate strong anti-takeover provisions with respect to their portfolio companies. Over time, companies may face pushback from the public, investors, proxy advisory firms and shareholder activists to remove certain anti-takeover provisions from their charter or bylaws and to develop better corporate governance practices.
In connection with their IPO, companies also put in place committee charters and adopt various corporate governance policies or amend existing ones to comply with stock exchange requirements, SEC rules and regulations and to align with market practice, including:
Considerable thought will need to be given to putting in place a robust governance framework in connection with an IPO to ensure that the company is able to comply with the various SEC and stock exchange requirements and the laws of the jurisdiction in which it was incorporated, as well as align its practices with those of public companies and the expectations of the public, shareholders and proxy advisory firms.
Orrick is passionate about entrepreneurship and shaping the long-term success of our clients. We advise public and private companies throughout the world on all aspects of their business and at every stage of their development and growth. Leading companies and investment banks turn to us for guidance and support in meeting their strategic objectives and navigating the capital raising environment—from the standard to the most innovative and complex—including initial public offerings and other public equity and debt transactions. With 1,100 lawyers based in key markets worldwide, our global platform allows us to meet the needs of our clients wherever they do business.
To join our mailing list, visit orrick.com.
Disclaimer
This publication is designed to provide Orrick clients and contacts with information they can use to more effectively manage their businesses and access Orrick’s resources. The contents of this publication are for informational purposes only. Neither this publication nor the lawyers who authored it are rendering legal or other professional advice or opinions on specific facts or matters. Orrick assumes no liability in connection with the use of this publication.