4 minute read | December.04.2025
On December 3, 2025, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued an exemptive order extending the compliance dates for two rules:
The extension effectively pauses implementation for two years. While the extension provides relief to market participants facing imminent compliance deadlines, the lengthy delay signals potential uncertainty regarding the ultimate fate of these highly controversial rules.
The genesis of the delay lies in a legal challenge brought by industry groups arguing that the SEC failed to adequately consider the cumulative economic effect of adopting multiple major market structure rules simultaneously. The 5th Circuit Court of Appeals agreed, remanding the rules to the SEC with instructions to perform a more robust cumulative economic analysis, which the SEC cited in its order.
Rather than proceeding with the original timeline while conducting this analysis, the SEC has opted to stay the compliance dates entirely to avoid imposing "sunk costs" on the industry should the rules be further modified or vacated.
Rule 13f-2 (Short Interest Reporting)
Rule 10c-1a (Securities Lending Reporting)
The order was not without its detractors. Commissioner Crenshaw issued a strongly worded dissenting statement, characterizing the two-year delay as excessive and potentially a strategic retreat from the agency's transparency mandate. Crenshaw argued that the economic analysis required by the 5th Circuit “should not take two years.” She expressed concern that the extension amounts to a “repeal by extension,” suggesting that the delay may be a precursor to watering down or abandoning the rules entirely under a shifting political or regulatory landscape.