People

马宇峰 (Yufeng Ethan Ma) 合伙人

Chicago; 北京

马律师专注于专利侵权、ITC 337调查、商业秘密窃取、不正当竞争等复杂知识产权诉讼及咨询。此外，在处理知识产权行政争议和复审、知识产权布局、知识产权尽职调查，以及战略交易所涉之知识产权方面（包括技术许可与转让、并购、企业合营与合作）亦拥有极丰富经验。其客户行业涵盖医疗器械、电脑软硬件、互联网、半导体、电子、通信、人工智能、汽车部件、化学、材料、能源等众多技术领域。近期代表客户包括百度、腾讯、中芯国际、京东、南微医学、vivo、酷派、安客、一加、智岩、蓝禾、Lovense、浙江荣鹏、三思电子、大族元亨、创显光电、好写科技、华益机电、视爵电子、应用材料、新思科技、Coilcraft, Hecate 等等。

马律师多年来协助客户解决涉外知识产权争端，带领其诉讼团队在多起涉及中国公司的ITC 337调查案和地区法院案中获得胜诉，赢得众多客户的长期信赖。在其代理的第一个337调查（337-TA-623）中，马律师成功代表被控专利侵权的中国国资委直属企业下属的四家公司在ITC进行抗辩，成功说服委员会发回重审并最后推翻前首席行政法官两次作出的不利判决，为客户赢得并无侵权且未违反337条款的最终判决。在另一起调查（337-TA-655）中，马律师代表原告及其中国子公司控告几家中国被告盗用商业秘密。ITC向这些被告颁发了长达10年的排除令。该判决成为美国商业秘密法和ITC管辖权发展史上的一个重要里程碑，并获得联邦巡回上诉法院的支持。从那时开始到现在，马律师为其客户赢得了一次又一次胜利，并且始终把以尽低的代价尽快为客户解决争端为己任。"马律师会代表客户以最小的代价了结此事，"这是一位获得胜诉的客户主动给其同行推荐马律师时的评价。

比如，2017年，马律师为客户深圳好写科技处理Kent Displays指控其侵犯与液晶电子手写板和组件相关专利的一起ITC 337调查（337-TA-1035），经过不到半年的积极诉讼就为客户获得完胜，原告被迫无条件撤诉。该案其后被《中国商法》杂志评为"2017年度杰出争议与调查案件"。

又比如，在UltraVision Technologies于2018年3月27日发起的和某些模块化LED显示屏及其组件相关的337调查案（337-TA-1114）里，马律师代表上海三思、深圳创显及大族元亨等多家被告公司，成功进行辩护，原告被迫在2018年11月的专家取证阶段无条件提出撤诉并申请ITC终止调查。ITC在2019年2月21 日下达了终裁判决，正式终止该调查。

加入奥睿前，马律师在一家全球领先的特殊玻璃与陶瓷材料制造商担任亚洲地区知识产权总监，负责处理该司在中国及亚洲其它地区知识产权的日常事务。在此之前，他在位于美国伊利诺伊州芝加哥市的McAndrews, Held & Malloy律师事务所长期执业，并担任其合伙人及董事会成员，马律师是该所的第一位外籍律师。

在过去20年间，马律师长期致力于为中美知识产权保护和交流架构桥梁的工作，并经常受邀在中美各处演讲，发表文章或者接受媒体采访。他还多年担任知识产权所有者协会（IPO）亚洲法律委员会的理事。马律师也积极参与政府或公益组织的"一带一路"和"走出去"项目，曾参与主持上海市商委的"走出去服务港"工作，目前是深圳市海外知识产权维权援助专家库专家，江苏南京智金-海外知识产权服务联盟（WIPA）的特别顾问，南京市海外知识产权专家智库专家，浙江省东阳市法律智库专家，上海国际经贸知识产权海外维权服务专家，上海市第一批知识产权海外纠纷应对之道专家库专家

张耀丽 (Yaoli Shelley Zhang) 合伙人

北京

张律师在知识产权领域内的经验包括：

• 中国专利无效程序，反假冒，反盗版及专利商标维权诉讼；
• 专利及商标申请，包括申请文件准备、审查意见/异议程序及复审程序；
• 对在中国营业的公司的专利和商标知识产权保护及技术转让/许可安排；
• 就知识产权保护战略、与研发相关的知识产权问题以及技术的出入口管制问题提供法律意见；
• 在美国国际贸易委员会337条款的调查、专利侵权诉讼和产品责任诉讼中为中国公司提供协助；及
• 知识产权尽职调查以及项目咨询。

Shane D. Anderson 高级律师

Los Angeles

Shane has experience working on patent disputes in Federal Court and before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board for globally-recognized companies in the domains of software, communications, consumer electronics, and other high-tech fields.  He understands what it takes to be successful in complex patent litigation and wields his unique experience and education to gain the best result possible for his clients.  Prior to joining Orrick's Intellectual Property Group Shane practiced in Silicon Valley as an associate at a global law firm and focused on patent litigation.

Prior to law school, Shane was an electrical engineer and worked both in Japan and Canada, developing test systems, embedded hardware, and supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) software.  Shane also worked as an educator in rural Japan, an experience that informs his ability to explain complex topics both clearly and persuasively.

Shane also has a passion for community service and pro bono representation.  Among his efforts, he assisted with the representation of plaintiffs in a Voting Rights Act, Section 2, litigation, and advised a small business owner and drafted agreements and contracts.

Jared Bobrow 合伙人

硅谷

Since the late 1980s, Jared has been involved extensively in all aspects of patent and technology-related litigation, including trials and appeals. He has earned a reputation with clients for managing complex cases efficiently and creatively. Jared is a hands-on litigator who learns and develops the critical facts, masters the technology and law, and weaves the facts and law into a story that a judge or jury will understand and embrace.

Jared is ranked Band 2 in the field of Intellectual Property: Patent in California and Intellectual Property: Nationwide by Chambers USA, and he has been recognized as a leading lawyer by Chambers Global 2013-2022, with sources describing him as “an exceptional litigator; one of the smartest lawyers you will ever meet,” as "extremely strategic, delivers excellent work product and argues well before the court ” and as “probably the finest patent litigator I have ever worked with. He has a keen intellect and a good sense of what will resonate with judges and juries.” He has been named a leading patent litigation attorney in California by IAM Patent Litigation 250 Magazine 2011 and by IAM Patent 1000 2012-2022. He has also been recognized as an “IP Star” in California by Managing Intellectual Property’s IP Stars since 2013, and he has been consistently selected among the “Top IP Attorneys” in California from 2016-2019 by the Daily Journal, a leading legal publication in California. He has been recognized by Benchmark Litigation as a “Local Litigation Star” since 2014 and as a “National Star” since 2018.

Mr. Bobrow previously served on Orrick’s management committee and co-chaired the firm’s global Intellectual Property practice.

Mr. Bobrow teaches patent litigation at U.C. Berkeley Law School, and has spoken and written on patent law, patent litigation, and trade secret matters.

Mr. Bobrow graduated in 1986 from Columbia Law School, where he served on the Columbia Law Review. In 1986 and 1987, he clerked for the Honorable Charles P. Sifton (E.D.N.Y.).

Bradford Breen 高级顾问律师

New York

Brad also advises professional services and financial services entities and technology companies regarding U.S. and international trademark and branding matters. He also has considerable experience in business method, electronic, semiconductor and computer patent counseling.

Evan Brewer 高级律师

硅谷

Drawing on his education background in aeronautical engineering, computer science, economics, and international relations, Evan can translate the complex and constantly-evolving business realities of today’s technology companies into cohesive and powerful legal arguments. In his practice, Evan guides cutting-edge U.S. and European technology companies through patent, copyright, trademark, and trade secret matters, and counsels companies on emerging cybersecurity and data privacy issues. Evan’s clients specialize in machine learning, autonomous driving, integrated circuits, consumer electronics, e-commerce, and medical device technology.

In his pro bono practice, Evan represents domestic violence survivors and counsels an international NGO on environmental law issues.

Before joining Orrick, Evan clerked for Judge Ronald M. Whyte at the Northern District of California.

Evan graduated magna cum laude and Order of the Coif from University of California, Hastings College of the Law, where he also served as Executive Articles Editor of the Hastings Science and Technology Law Review. While in law school, he was an extern for Judge Lucy H. Koh at the Northern District of California.

Outside of work, Evan enjoys competitive ski racing and endurance cycling.

Alyssa Caridis 合伙人

Los Angeles; Santa Monica

Alyssa represents companies in all stages of litigation — from pre-suit investigation, through trial, and on to appeals court. In 2023 alone, she was a key member of Orrick teams that won two jury verdicts, three ITC proceedings, and numerous IPRs and dispositive motions.

She draws upon her engineering degree from Harvey Mudd College to engage with technical professionals and quickly grasp new technologies. She brings experience with technologies ranging from medical devices, streaming media systems and software to projects in the aerospace, automotive, and nuclear energy industries.  She also has experience in litigation under the Hatch-Waxman Act, successfully defending generic challenges to patents protecting blockbuster medical therapies.  Most recently, Alyssa has been involved in both litigation and counseling involving the legal questions raised by the rapid growth of AI.

The Daily Journal recognized Alyssa as one of the Top Women Lawyers in California in 2023 and both Bloomberg Law and Daily Journal named her to their 40 Under 40 lists.

For Alyssa, IP protection is more than business; it’s personal. For more than a half-century, her family patented mechanical technologies that they developed into a thriving business, inspiring her love of science and technology as well as her desire to protect innovative ideas. Alyssa calls Southern California home, but remains loyal to the sports teams of her Bay Area childhood.