4 minute read | March.12.2026
Visit our Tariff Watch resource center to track the latest legal and regulatory developments, recovery strategies, and potential shifts in U.S. trade policy following the Supreme Court’s tariff decision.
It’s hard to imagine what a system for refunding $166 billion in tariffs to 330,000 different importers might look like, but the picture seems to be coming into focus.
Lord filed CBP’s first progress report today and it provides some new insights into how the refund process might work.
CBP’s system of record for imported merchandise is called the Automated Commercial Environment (ACE). The refund system will be added to ACE and it will be called the Consolidated Administration and Processing of Entries (CAPE).
As envisioned by CBP, CAPE will include four integrated components: Claim Portal, Mass Processing, Review and Liquidation/Reliquidation, and Refund.
CBP expects there will be a “phased development” CAPE, meaning CBP will introduce basic functionality initially, with more advanced features coming later. Entries that are subject to antidumping or countervailing duties or entries for which the liquidation status in ACE is “Suspended,” “Extended,” or “Under Review” and certain other entry types may require these advanced features and so may not be eligible for processing initially.
The government may still pursue appeals of the CIT’s initial refund order or subsequent orders. Apart from such appeals, the courts might not accept CBP’s proposed refund arrangements. But CBP appears to be making real progress toward having the ability to process and pay refunds on a massive scale.
Orrick is helping clients navigate the implications of CBP’s report and other tariff refund developments for their businesses—including advising on proactive internal measures to position themselves for refunds, monitoring tariff litigation and related administrative actions, and developing litigation and protest strategies for prospective recoveries.
[1] The case is Atmus Filtration, Inc. v. United States, No. 26-01259 (Ct. Int'l Trade filed Feb. 27, 2026).
[2] The CIT entered an amended order on March 5, 2026. The amended order limited the applicability of the original March 4 order directing CBP to issue refunds to IEEPA duties “imposed by the Executive Orders considered by the Supreme Court in Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump, 2026 WL 477534 (U.S. Feb. 20, 2026).”