3 minute read | March.29.2024
Two new privacy laws regulating consumer health data in Nevada and Washington take effect March 31.
These novel laws take an expansive view of “consumer health data” and cover much more data than you may expect.
Companies should take notice even if they don’t think they collect consumer health data: They might be surprised.
Washington’s My Health My Data and Nevada’s similar law impose new obligations on companies collecting health data, including:
These laws are particularly tricky because the definition of consumer health data is expansive. It includes not only what would traditionally be considered health information (such as individually identifiable information regarding an individual’s physical and mental health and condition), but also information regarding “bodily functions,” “measurements,” and inferences made about health from non-consumer health information. Additionally, the definition includes biometric information and may be broad enough to include photographs and audio recordings.
Companies that may not traditionally view themselves as healthcare companies may be in the mix—for example,
Moreover, “consumers” include not only residents in Washington and Nevada but also individuals whose consumer health data is processed in these states (even if not residents of those states).
While both laws have important exceptions for protected health information under HIPAA and some research data, Washington does not have entity-level exceptions. Moreover, neither law has applicability thresholds, although some small companies may take advantage of a delayed effective date for Washington’s My Health My Data. Therefore, from start-ups to mature companies, businesses must carefully consider the applicability of these laws to their operations.
Under both laws, the state Attorney General may bring enforcement actions.
Under Washington’s My Health My Data, the Attorney General may seek to recover:
Washington’s My Health My Data also includes a private right of action. We expect the plaintiffs’ bar to be active, particularly in terms of tracking technologies on company websites collecting consumer health data for marketing purposes.
The Nevada Attorney General may obtain an injunction or other relief, including a civil penalty of not more than $10,000 for each violation.
If you haven’t considered your company’s compliance obligations, we recommend you prioritize these four action items:
We are committed to helping our clients determine their obligations, defend their practices, and update their compliance programs to address these new consumer health data laws. If you face an enforcement action or lawsuit under these laws—or if you would like advice on how to avoid them—please contact one of the authors (Thora Johnson, Matthew Coleman, Kyle Kessler, and Cosmas Robless) or other members of the Orrick team.