PayPal Secures Another Victory in Consolidated Honey Browser Extension Cases


2 minute read | December.03.2025

In a win recognized in American Lawyer’s Litigator of the Week column and reported by The Recorder, PayPal and its subsidiary Honey Science Corp. secured a dismissal without prejudice of all claims in California federal court in a lawsuit alleging that its Honey browser extension “stole” commissions from plaintiffs. The case, Wendover Productions v. PayPal, involves a consolidated action of 25+ similar cases relating to Honey.

  • The plaintiffs, influencers who engage in affiliate marketing, contend that when shoppers who use Honey made online purchases, merchant commissions that they were allegedly entitled to would be diverted to PayPal instead, based on the industry-standard “last-click attribution” system.
  • Following oral argument by Orrick’s Rich Jacobsen, the court on November 21 agreed with PayPal that the plaintiffs failed to plead injury traceable to Honey, and that the plaintiffs had also failed to plead facts showing they were entitled to the commissions to begin with. In addition to lack of standing, the court agreed with PayPal that the complaint failed to plead any federal statutory or state business tort claims.
  • This win comes on the heels of a California federal court dismissal without prejudice for PayPal in Tom Campbell v. Honey Science – another Honey lawsuit involving 6.8 million UK residents that Rich Jacobsen also argued.

Led by Rich, the Orrick team includes partners Clem Roberts, Paul Rugani, Marc Shapiro and Geoff Moss.