On September 17, 2014, the
European Court of Justice (ECJ) rendered its judgment in
high-profile case C-7/13 upon request for a preliminary ruling in
the proceedings Skandia America Corp. (USA), filial Sverige vs.
Skatteverket, the Swedish tax authority.
The ECJ upheld the Swedish tax
authority´s position, against the Advocate General M. Wathelet´s
view expressed in May 2014, that supplies of services from a non-EU
based corporation to its branch in a EU Member State constitute
taxable transactions when the branch is grouped in the EU Member
State for VAT purposes. The ECJ further found that the VAT group was
liable for the value added tax payable under these circumstances.
According to the ECJ´s
findings, Skandia America Corp, a US arm of the Swedish insurance
group, was the global purchasing company for IT services and
distributed some of these externally-purchased IT services
to its own Swedish branch. The branch was grouped for Swedish VAT
purposes with other Swedish businesses of the Skandia group. After
further processing, the Swedish branch then supplied `IT-production´
further within and beyond its VAT group.
The group had taken the legal
position that no VAT applied to the supply of IT services from
the US to the Swedish branch on the grounds that these were
intra-personal supplies within one and the same legal entity. That
position has now been refuted by the ECJ. An appeal is not possible.
The decision of the ECJ may be
especially harmful for financial institutions like banks or insurers
which have outsourced IT and other services under similar
circumstances. Financial institutions often cannot claim input VAT
refund in the EU, so any VAT arising creates extra costs. VAT costs
would range between 15% and 27% of the value of the outsourced
services, depending on the national VAT rate where the branch is
located. Other industries may also be affected.
US and other non-EU
corporations should consider to review their exposure due to
outsourcing arrangements and/or their supplies to European branches.
EU corporations, although not mentioned explicitly in the decision
of the ECJ, should also review the decision´s legal implications on
their business model if they operate branches in a different EU
member state.
For further information
please contact Stefan Schultes-Schnitzlein or any of the other
attorneys listed to the right.