Katie Lieberg Stowe

Managing Associate
Securities Litigation & Regulatory Enforcement

Ms. Stowe's primary practice is defending federal and state securities fraud claims related to stock, debt, and mortgage-backed securities.  She also has experience in related insurance and indemnification matters.

Her recent engagements include the following:

  • Representing a bank in actions by monoline insurers seeking to deny coverage under financial guarantees covering residential mortgage-backed securitizations. 
  • Representing the former president of the nation’s largest mortgage lender in litigation with the SEC in the Central District of California, multiple suits by equity and debt holders, and litigation brought by RMBS investors and insurers in jurisdictions across the country. 
  • Representing corporations and executives in internal investigations and criminal investigations, investigating allegations related to compliance, fiduciary duty, and securities laws issues. 

Ms. Stowe is the co-editor of the RMBS Litigation section of Orrick’s Financial Industry blog.  She devotes a portion of her practice to pro bono activities, including the Volunteer Legal Services Program and the Michigan Innocence Clinic.

Prior to joining Orrick, Ms. Stowe clerked for the Honorable Irma E. Gonzalez in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. 

Katie Stowe
Admitted In
  • California
Education
  • J.D., magna cum laude, University of Michigan Law School, 2007
  • A.B., Biology, Dartmouth College, 2004
Honors
  • Order of the Coif
  • Article Editor, Michigan Law Review
Clerkships
  • Hon. Irma E. Gonzalez, Chief Judge, United States District Court, Southern District of California, 2007-2008
Memberships
  • Rotary Club of San Francisco

Please do not include any confidential, secret or otherwise sensitive information concerning any potential or actual legal matter in this e-mail message. Unsolicited e-mails do not create an attorney-client relationship and confidential or secret information included in such e-mails cannot be protected from disclosure. Orrick does not have a duty or a legal obligation to keep confidential any information that you provide to us. Also, please note that our attorneys do not seek to practice law in any jurisdiction in which they are not properly authorized to do so.

By clicking "OK" below, you understand and agree that Orrick will have no duty to keep confidential any information you provide.

OK
Cancel